Why Doctors Are Reluctant To Embrace Electronic Medical Records

Small doctor's offices across America areMost medical practices are run by doctors,
accustomed to doing business in a certain way.nurses, and a small administrative staff that is
When a patient checks in, the administrative stafffocused on client care and billing. They don't have
pulls out a file folder containing a medical history, aa technical support staff to select or maintain and
record of doctor's visits, test results, andEMR system. There are more than 300 EMR
physician's scrawl jotted down about the patient'svendors in the marketplace right now, and it's
history. When the doctor begins his or herdifficult for a small medical practice to determine
consultation, it's easy for them to thumb throughwhich companies are the industry leaders, and
the pages and get up to speed on your medicalwhich vendors might go out of business in the
history.first five years of implementation. Rather than
But small offices are under increasing pressure tomake a “wrong” decision, small practices
scan these files and convert them to electronicoften prefer to stay with the status quo.
medical records (EMRs) and make paper files aHigh Implementation Costs
thing of the past. In fact, President Obama hasIn an era where small practices are fighting for
set a goal for every American to have an EMRsurvival, the cost associated with converting to an
by 2014.Electronic Medical Record system is significant.
However, despite nearly $17 billion in economicAccording to a 2009 study produced by Avalere
stimulus money that is dedicated to medicalHealth, a government sponsored research
records scanning, many small practices arecompany, it will cost the average small practice
reluctant to make the change.$125,000 to $150,000. And this is only the direct
EMRs Won't Provide Significant Changes to Carecosts of hiring a scanning service and purchasing
Family practitioners typically enjoy closethe EMR system. They did not include the offices
relationships with their patients, built over years oftime to prepare the documents for scanning or
routine health issues. “ I don't want to sit inreview them once converted. The government
front of a patient looking into a laptop,” sayshas offered many incentives to offset the cost,
one Denver doctor. “I'd rather look into thebut Avalere researches say that at best, these
patients' eyes” While he acknowledges someincentives would add up to only $44,000 an office.
benefits to all of the patient data being availablePrivacy Concerns
on screen, there isn't a great deal of informationMany doctors are concerned about maintaining the
sharing going on. Each hospital system uses aprivacy of their patients' data. With an EMR, files
different EMR system, and there isn't aare often stored in off-site databanks, commonly
standardized format that solves thecalled the cloud. Because of the portability of
communication problems between hospitals,electronic records, a single breach at a large EMR
physicians and labs. ”We tend to print out theholder could expose a large number of people's
data and store it in a paper file. For me, t here isrecords. It is not just a loss of privacy but they
something intuitive about paper chart andare now exposed to identity theft, social stigma,
prescription pad” the doctor adds.and even increases in your insurance premiums.
Difficult to Select an EMR provider