Virtual Teams in Education

The future of business is not in brick and mortartelephone use is not unexpected considering the
institutions as historically viewed. The proliferationworldwide locations of BU students.
and miniaturization of communications mediums,Probing deeper, email use is actually higher from
cellular telephone, fax, Internet, personal datainstructor to student. Within the Cyberactice®
devices, and lap top computers, make officesenvironment there is a tab titled
available where people are – not where the“Communication.” Within this link is an
office is.option to send an email to all or select users. All
Carpenter (1998) wrote the internet is moreadjuncts confirmed this option is the choice they
versatile for communication than any mediumuse to send messages to individuals, select
available today. People can interact with individualsgroups, or an entire class. When probed,
or groups, they can identify by name,instructors agreed they use this email option
pseudonym, or be anonymous. She says theregularly. After another query into percentage of
internet is “…a virtual communitycommunication by email using the
where people meet, engage in discourse, becomeCyberactive® email option, instructors replied
friends, fall in love, and develop all of thetheir email communication is higher, up to 50
relationships that are developed in physicalpercent. It is important to clarify that instructors
communities” (pg. 1).did not directly associate email in the
However, the internet may not be a panacea.Cyberactive® environment with other email
The internet goes beyond technology into socialengines.
interaction. Organizations face a dilemma ofThere were very broad concerns expressed by
encouraging successful interactions andthe interviewees and all were technical, from
community building online. Statistics suggest almostneeding more technical support to wanting less
ten million people work in virtual offices and thattechnical support. This question needed more
40 percent of large organizations have policies onclarification. The respondents confirmed their
telecommuting. Yet, Carpenter (1998), citedmeaning of technical support as surrounding the
above, says virtual employment equals only sevenelectronic classroom. Although all online instructors
to ten percent of the work force.must complete the Online Facilitators Course, four
Why hasn’t the virtual office flourished?of the five realized their attention to it was not
Sociologists suggest it is the need for informalthe best possible. Challenged for why the four did
interaction – office banter. Organizations arenot participate more in the facilitator course, they
stubborn to accept virtual teams believing teamadmitted to “filling a square” to teach
projects work best carried out over conferenceonline. All replied there are times when they all call
tables and virtual workers can only participate inor email the Cyberactive® Help Desk for
individual assignments. Still other organizationsassistance.
believe virtual workers do not receive adequateAnother unanimous concern was how well
supervision. However, is the problem supervisionprepared students are to enter an electronic
or trust?classroom. Each respondent related at least one
Kohrell (2005), an adjunct professor at Bellevuestory of a student ill prepared to study online.
University, is president of Technology AsInstructor receives a profile of each student in
Promised. He is a specialist in developing virtualclass, therefore a follow up question on student
teams and addresses developing trust on virtualage suggested age was less a concern than
teams. He explains virtual trust in simple terms.students’ career and regular use of
Virtual trust is getting on an airplane, not knowingcomputers for email, topic research, and
the air traffic controllers, yet trusting they areunderstanding of inter- versus intra-net.
doing their jobs correctly. He explains buildingFeeling as Part of a Team
virtual trust through communication –The adjuncts all feel they are part of a work
frequently, with integrity, with certainty andteam. Specifically, they felt part of their work
predictability.team, part of the Cyberactive® classroom
Other data, taken with Kohrell’s, alsogroup, but not closely connected to the University.
supports the economics of the virtual office.The reason given is distance from the physical
Verma (2005) offers some information thatlocation – Bellevue, Nebraska. They did
shows senior executives from Europe, Asia, andreport steps taken by the College of Professional
the Unites States report cost savings (69Studies as helping them become more connected.
percent) and increased productivity (64 percent)One example they all like is the weekly email of
when using telecommuting. Verma citesthe campus bulletin, another is periodic email
comments of Joe Roitz, AT&T. Roitz said,messages of faculty development seminars.
“Telework alone generates over $150Faculty development seminars are now video
million annually in productivity increases, real estatetaped, converted to digital media, and available in
savings, and enhanced retention forstreaming video online or DVD format mailed.
AT&T.” These statistics suggestSupporting some of the research reported earlier,
business recognize change and develop strategiesthe respondents felt disconnected from the
for successful change.University and more connected if they could
Tucker, Kao, and Verma (2005) write there aremake trips to the campus, meet with program
trends in employment that organizations cannotdirectors, deans, and fellow faculty members.
ignore. One point they make is the work forceClarifying this point, they did not feel under
globally is getting smaller. They also recognize thatsupervised, rather did not feel a personal
cultural norms are different now, more loose.(personally) connected. An expectation was that
Adding to the mix is more freedom for people tothose now adjuncts who were Bellevue University
move globally. They point out there are personnelstudents would feel more connected. While the
trends that organizations can count onformer students felt more connected, they too
1. Smaller and less sufficiently skilleddid not feel a close bond.
2. Increasingly globalThe discussion moved to questions of leadership.
3. Highly virtualSpecifically asked was how well do they know
4. Vastly diverse, and(know of) the University leadership team. All knew
5. Autonomous and empowerednames and positions of the president, provost,
They conclude that leadership focus within thesedeans, and program directors. They did not know
trends “demand a new generation of talentany of the names associated with positions of
management.” This new talentsenior administrative people and senior people
management has to take some strategic steps tooutside their particular college. Asked if they knew
manage the new work force in future orientedany names of board members, each knew U.S.
organizations. Those steps are:Senator Chuck Hagel is a board member. Others
1. Predictive Workforce Monitoring and Strategicknew names of benefactors thinking they were
Talent Decision Makingboard members.
2. Flexible and Anticipatory Talent SourcingTying the interviews together, the discussion
3. Customized and Personalized Rewards andturned to specifics of communication. The focus
Communicationsat this stage was the level of interdepartmental
4. Distributed and Influential Leadershipcommunication compared to intradepartmental
5. Unified and Compassionate Culturescommunication. Those interviewed commented
Computer-mediated Communication (CMC)that intradepartmental communication was good.
It is important to discuss CMC as virtual workersAdjuncts knew, through email and/or telephone
depend on – rely on –communication, their program director, some or all
computer-mediated communication. Jones (1998)the department faculty. All reported a lack of
cites Patton (1986) in discussion about highwayknowledge outside their program area. An adjunct
building as a means to connect people to onein healthcare administration is unlikely to
another. Patton observed that highways have notcross-communicate with faculty from
connected us rather increased our sense ofmanagement or leadership. An instructor in
separateness. Cities are divided, neighborhoodsbusiness administration will not know anyone
split, city intimacy destroyed. From this negativeteaching in human resources or security
view, Jones concludes the internet may actuallymanagement. Distant adjuncts in the College of
do what highways failed to doProfessional Studies seem isolated from faculty
Computer-mediated communication, it seams, willmembers of other colleges. Generally, faculty
do by way of electronic pathways what cementmembers in one college do not teach in other
roads were unable to do, namely, connect uscolleges.
rather than atomize us, put us at the controls ofThe interviewees made recommendations to
a “vehicle” and yet not detach usimprove communication ranging from more email
from the rest of the world. (pg. 3)communication to making trips to the campus to
CMC offers new realms for social scientists tomeet the staff. Trips to campus from distant
study. Traditionally, social scientists observedlocations seemed impractical from a cost aspect
communities within certain identified boundary.because such a trip would not be at university
However, new cyber societies exist withoutexpense. Asked how to improve electronic
bounds and determination of membership in cybercommunication, all agreed more is better. Citing an
society does not satisfy traditional categoriesexample of missed opportunity, they said the
given community.university produces a faculty roster and places it
Education in Cyber Societyon the server “shared drive.”
What does this mean in terms of education? TheHowever, distant locations do not have access to
United States Department of Education (US-DOE)the internal system.
provides a look into higher education statistics forPersonal Experience
twelve months 2000 to 2001. US-DOE figuresStated early in this paper, I am an online adjunct
from that period show 56 percent (2320)but live in the community the university calls
post-secondary two- and four-year schools hadhome. This gives me a different perspective
online courses. Another twelve percent desire tobecause I can personally interact with instructors
go online within the next three years. Finally, 31from different colleges and programs. After five
percent said they would not go online. Clearly,years in administration as a graduate enrollment
two-thirds of colleges and universities have orcounselor, I developed personal networks with
want online educational opportunities for students.many senior program directors and deans. For
What does this mean for faculty? The followingnearly the same period, I was an adjunct, first in
paragraph addresses that question.the College of Arts and Sciences and now in CPS.
The Higher Learning Commission accreditsI taught Organizational Communication in a
Bellevue University in Nebraska. It has an onlineface-to-face classroom and Leadership online.
presence offering 17 undergraduate degreeValidating the interviewees’ comments,
completion programs online and 7 graduatecommunication to adjuncts has been limited. One
degree programs online. The College oflimiting factor was the capability of the university
Professional Studies (CPS) of Bellevue Universityemail server to support several hundred email
administers all of the undergraduate degreeaddresses. This problem is resolved with the
programs. CPS administers three of the seveninstallation of a new larger email server. Another
graduate degrees, MBA and Master of Arts inlimiting factor was not all adjuncts had a
Management reside in the College of Business, and“(name) @” university email address.
MS Computer Information Systems and MSAn initiative of the Quality Council was requiring all
Management of Information Systems reside inadjuncts have an internal email address and
the College of Information Technology. Althoughremote access to the email server. This initiative
the College of Arts and Sciences administers nois now complete with separate distributions for
online degrees, it does administer several course“all campus,” “all
clusters and individual online courses. Therefore,adjuncts,” and “all (college specific)
Bellevue University is an example of an institutionadjuncts.”
highly oriented to the online student.An advantage to being an online adjunct in the
Online, mostly adult learner, students equalsame community where the university is located
approximately 40 percent of the Universityis proximity. With proximity, there is access to
population. Bellevue University also has bothmany in leadership positions and interaction with
traditional four-year campus students andpeers. A closer connection with faculty peers
non-traditional in class adult learners making up theallows a support system to develop face-to-face
rest of the University student population. A boastthat a distant adjunct cannot as easily develop.
made during the 2004/2005 academic year wasProximity allows faster communication and
that Bellevue University has students in all 24 timereaction to communication. Closeness permits
zones around the world and the North and Southattendance to faculty development live rather
Poles.than streaming video or DVD.
CPS accounts for the largest number of facultyWhile the advantages of proximity seem
members. Of CPS faculty, about 150 are adjunctfavorable, there are some downsides. There are
and one-third of those are faculty members atgreater expectations that a local adjunct spends
distant locations teaching online (informationtime on campus when there primary job allows.
provided the Assistant College Administrator).The faculty resource center offers an adjunct an
However, this is not unique to Bellevue University.office environment where one can have the
A web search of colleges with online offeringsoffice time expected. College meeting attendance
returns dozens of institutions. Narrowing a webby local adjuncts is not mandated; however, it is
search to fully accredited schools with onlinemore favorable to attend. Those operating at a
offerings returns numerous hits. Well known in thedistance desire to attend meetings and cannot
online arena are University of Phoenix, Capella,have it.
Nova Southeastern, and Walden. Among these,Conclusion
University of Phoenix is very aggressive in bothThe interview process with adjunct instructors
student and faculty recruitment. It is not unusualworking at a distance offer supporting data to the
for students to transfer between online schoolsstatistics reported earlier in this paper. The
searching for lower tuition rates and/or moreadjuncts interviewed are part time virtual
liberal credit transfer policies. In addition, it is likelyemployees who feel less a part of the University
an adjunct professor may instruct in multipleteam than someone local. They reported
universities.incomplete communication with and knowledge of
Online Faculty Interviewsmany key leadership people.
Of the about 50 online distant faculty members atCommunication seems the center of disconnect.
Bellevue University, five responded to invitationsThe Academic Quality Improvement Process also
for phone or email interviews. Another interviewrecognized this problem and implemented
with an online adjunct that lives in the Omahainstitutional change to tie all members to campus
metro area serves to validate other facultylife. Although more effort is underway for broader
comments. One distant faculty member doescommunication, distant employees do not have
teach at two other institutions, one online, andaccess to local systems through remote means.
one face to face. Finally, I will submit personalConsidering these elements and considering the U.
observations, my experiences, as an onlineS. Department of Education’s statistics,
adjunct, face-to-face instructor and one thatonline education is likely to flourish. Bellevue
taught in multiple institutions.University attracts students from around the
All those interviewed were unanimous inworld with many of them earning degrees online
answering why they are adjunct collegefrom their home countries.
professors, they like teaching. The responsesDespite the drawbacks, virtual professors as
varied from “I like sharing what I’vevirtual team members are successful at Bellevue
learned,” to “It is fun to see, throughUniversity because of the expressed desire to
their postings, how they (students) grow andteach and watch their students grow and learn.
change over the year period of a degreeThe professionalism and expertise these
program.” To follow up, they answeredprofessors exhibit in the online community of
teaching online is new to them, an interesting waystudents supports the data from industry
to link students, and a way to connect peopleexecutives indicating improved productivity and
geographically separate for a common goalcost savings.
(education).Pfeffer (1998) identifies the use of
One interviewee, a medical doctor in Indianasub-contractors in the work force. Adjuncts are
teaches healthcare administration at Bellevuesub-contractors. The adjuncts serve in
University to “stay connected with nursesnon-traditional ways contrary to how professors
and other medical administrators. A hard lessonpreviously served. It is apparent that education is
for doctors to learn is they don’t runno different from other industries using virtual
anything.” In addition to teaching at Bellevueworkers. Virtual workers, like temporary workers,
University, he developed a course adopted intofeel less connected – not given the same
the Master of Healthcare Administration in CPS.level of training.
He shared that he also is a mentor for third andIn interview, establishing trust was critical to two
fourth year medical residents working to passadjuncts. In-person trust is much easier to
their medical boards. He does not teach in thisdevelop than in virtual relationships. Bell (2002)
role, rather facilitates medical residents’says trust is a leap of faith and places trust below
leaning and board preparation. He related that thistruth, “… caringly frank and
role requires developing a trust and trustingcompassionately straightforward… in pursuit
relationship between him and his mentored doctor.of clean communication” (pg. 9).
He said he always begins the mentoringAn indirect conclusion from the interviews
relationship in a face-to-face environment beforehighlights that mentoring a virtual adjunct may
moving it to telephone or email. He told thathelp develop a sense of team participation
teaching online and handling student problems andthrough greater knowledge and understanding of
misunderstandings is much less trying thanthe institutions vision and values. By developing
mentoring new doctors.greater emersion into the vision and values of the
The local interview, conducted in person, was withsystem, adjuncts may want to be more aware
the executive assistant to the universityof those people filling leadership roles. Successful
president. He used to teach in the classroom;virtual workers need the same assistance and
however, schedule demands took him out ofopportunity for growth as the worker inside the
class. Teaching online lets him keep his connectionbrick and mortar institution.
to students while maintaining a busy travelReferences
schedule.Bell, C.R. (2002). Managers as Mentors: Building
When asked why they applied to teach atPartnership for Learning (2nd edition). San
Bellevue University, the answers ranged widely.Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
One instructor, an Army retired Chief WarrantCarpenter, J. L. (Fall Semester 1998). Building
Officer, began teaching a year after graduatingCommunity in the Virtual Workplace. Online at
with a master degree from Bellevue. TheDavid Kohrell (personal communication, September
university approached him rather than him initiating18, 2005) noting virtual team performance.
an application. Another, now teaching at theJones, S. G. (1998). Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting
Atlanta campus of the University of Georgia, andComputer-Mediated Communication and
previously at the U.S. Air Force Academy, appliedCommunity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
to Bellevue because of the University’sKohrell, D. (2005). Effective Virtual Teams
close ties to military students. One respondent is[PowerPoint presentation]. PMI North Carolina:
an empty nester, disabled from her nursingTechnology As Promised.
profession, and wanted to stay activeMarilyn Urquhart (personal communication, October
pre-retirement. There was not a consistent3, 2005) noting total number of adjuncts and
answer to this question except when tying it tonumber of adjuncts teaching online from
their enjoyment of teaching.distributed locations.
All those interviewed are online instructors,Pfeffer, J. (1998). The Human Equation: Building
therefore, virtual to their students. All reportedprofits by putting people first. Boston, MA:
using email and telephone as primaryHarvard Business School Press.
communication devices with their students.Tuker, E., Kao, T., and Verma, N. (2005).
Additionally, they all use the Bellevue UniversityNext-Generation Talent Management: Insights on
Cyberactive® learning environment poweredHow Workforce Trends are Changing the Face of
by Blackboard to conduct classes. They reportedTalent Management. Business Credit 107, 7. 20-27.
highs of 40 percent and lows of ten percent useU. S. Department of Education (2001). Washington,
of email for student communication. All reportedDC. Online at [
using the telephone to contact students; however,Verma, N. (2005). Making the Most of Virtual
telephone use was a low five to ten percent. LowWork. WorldatWork Journal, 14, 2. 15-23.