Utilization Review Management Free

Utilization Review Management makes $8 millionself-funded health plan's claims costs. The usage
difference for JCWS Health Planof evidence-based clinical care guidelines was
Utilization Review Management Situationexecuted in a step-wise approach allowing the
Like several American businesses, ever risinghealth plan to realize opportunities for immediate
expense of healthcare has been drasticallyimpact and reinvestment of saved resources into
impacting on Johnson Controls World Servicesadditional services. This new approach yielded
(JCWS). Their particular self-funded health plansteady progress toward meeting JCWS's goal: a
trust encompassed 14,000 personnel who'repopulation that is well-educated, and empowered
spread out over more than seventy US locationsto utilize preventative health strategies, early
and a minimum of ten international cities. Theintervention for health issues, and best-in-class
populace had been separated in half withmedical care. Resources were able to allocated to
approximately fifty percent of the associatesareas of highest need through the specific,
assigned to government contracts and fiftyactionable results of data mining. Outbound calls
percent to private. The health plan had beenstarted with the top 1% of claimants in cost and
facing DCAA direction to be able to segregateor risk.
the trust funds into independent government andOnce the 1% was completed, the top 5% were
private accounts, had simply no trustworthyaddressed. Additional condition specific areas
claims experience, has been encounteringwhere JCWS's occurrences and or spending were
astonishing substantial claim costs, and had beenout of proportion to national averages
predicting a 2.1 million dollar deficiency on 12 millionbenchmarks were addressed. The group's
dollars in claims.covered members were provided with
Once the resources were segregated the totalone-on-one interactions with RNs. Members asked
amount within the federal government part of thequestions and offered informative details that RNs
trust began to diminish at an alarming rate.used to further assist them in becoming
Exploration of the cause concluded in variouseducated, empowered consumers. Consistent,
areas of concern. To begin with, the commercialdedicated communication between THE ANCHOR
side of the trust had seemingly been subsidizingGROUP and members developed a relationship
the federal and the federal populace seemed toand trust in the plan that was rare in previous
possess a higher risk profile. Secondly, 31 individualyears. The use of the PC3M® model also
claimants accounted for 39.4% of the annual claimprovided the ability to measure the impact of
experience in 2003. Two individual claimantsinterventions from a clinical quality stand-point, a
accounted for 8% of the plan's total claimspatient satisfaction stand-point, and from a
increase. Over the same time frame, individualfinancial stand-point.
claims in the $20-49K range had elevated byResults
61%. Every one of these issues ran JCWS'sJCWS was grossly aware of the deficits in their
average claims charges 24% higher than theirhealth plan. The first step to securing their future
TPA's book of business. This was a unacceptablewas initiation of Utilization Management, Case
rate for just about any group to face.Management, and Maternity Management. Not until
To address the problem, the Company institutedresults of this first claims analysis were they able
weekly supervising along with reporting of trustto visualize the depths of the previous deficits.
assets, monthly executive reviews, innovativeThis inaugural step was able to decrease the
trust payments, and made mid-year adjustmentsprojected claims by $54.11 PMPM. The number of
to the plan. The erosion of benefits and alsohospitalizations per 1000 members was down, as
growing payments were not well accepted withwell as the length of stay for each of those
this populace who had bathed within the ease andadmissions. The second step was to identify and
comfort regarding stable premiums for 2 years.rank the plan's issues with a now-solid database.
Despite these kinds of significant efforts in place,Individual members and general trends were
JCWS nevertheless suffered double-digit inflation,identified and interventions were put in place to
an expected $3.6 million dollar short-fall, and 40%evaluate and alleviate projected costs. Step three
Collective\Bargaining Agreements, along withof the Step-Wise Method of Implementation of
increasing workforce dissatisfaction inside a highlyPC3M® was to sit down and do something with
aggressive marketplace.the facts on hand. Registered Nurses start
Answer Descriptiontouching individual patients through outbound
In an effort to uncover some method ofphone calls and mailings. These nurses have been
reversing the increasing costs that up to now hadtrained to not only educate the member on the
merely been slowed, the plan chose to refocuscondition that identified them but also on any
by realizing along with adopting a few fundamentalother facts that present themselves through
health plan and health care concepts. The planthorough evaluation.
recognized what they referred to as "basic truthsRisk Indicators and overall claims dollars spent
about health care":were used as "triggers", not just the top
• Quality Treatment Costs Much lessconditions as in older medical management models.
• Most Participants Don't Have a clue onPopulation Management Initiatives were developed
Selecting Top quality Providersbased on data mining results. These included a
• Patients with Advocates within thesix-month drive on key issues identified in this
HealthCare System Get Much better Outcomespopulation as well as direct mailings to high-risk
• Non-Compliance is actually Harmful as well asmembers. The next step was to identify risk
Priceyusing data and surveys. This simple and relatively
• A Small Portion within the Populace Accountsinexpensive step had several unexpected results.
for a large percentage of the entire CostMembers actually reported making lifestyle and
(Beginning/End State)health behavior changes based solely on the
• Most Diagnoses is done via Laboratory Worksurvey. A better understanding of lifestyle
• The Initial Part of Medical Information is bybehavior issues that were driving the health
way of Laboratory Work or Rxconditions in the population was revealed through
• Prevention Costs Less When compared withclaims mining as well as the ability to begin
Treating Diseasepredicting the next year's issues and proactively
• Most Long-term Conditions Possess Expectedaddress them in hopes of averting them. This
Patternsself-assessment also brought to light the impact
• People Will Take the road of Leastcorporate culture had on health care costs.
Resistance, Including the Path regarding LowestAt the end of year one of these interventions,
Chargethe self-funded health plan had gone from a 3.5
The plan set out on a mission to choose amillion dollar deficit to a 4.5 million dollar surplus! ER
partner who could address these issues. Thevisits almost disappeared, and premature babies
fundamental premise was to follow the data tovirtually disappeared. The savings were used to
identify the specific areas that required attention.enhance benefits, and the plan now offers
The objectives included improved employeepreventative health services at NO COST to
satisfaction, improved healthcare quality,members. The financial results from year 2
decreased absenteeism, increased productivity,interventions will soon be through the auditing
and finally overall control of health care costs. Aultprocess. In year 3 the plan will continue their
International Medical Management (A.I.M.M.) wascurrent services with A.I.M.M. and will enhance
selected to partner with the health plan to providethose services to take an even more assertive
PC3M®, a unique Patient-Centric Comprehensivestance on preventative health initiatives. Medical
Care Management model of medical managementclaims costs for the self-funded health plan
services.continue to decrease and the plan has completed
The PC3M® service focuses on improving healthavoided all cost escalation for 3 years, even with
care quality through patient education andincreased coverage and benefits, and no increase
empowerment as a means of decreasing thein employee cost-sharing.