The Alternative to Healthcare Reform

Before we embark on a debate about healthcareclaiming their products "cure" a particular disease
it might be useful to define, first of all, what dowhen in fact they do. The FDA just hasn't
we actually mean by the use of this word. If weapproved them and they probably cannot afford
look at the words "health" and "care" one wouldthe FDA's fees.
assume healthcare would mean, "taking care ofIf we take a look at the second biggest player in
our health" but is that what is means in the Unitedthe healthcare industry, the insurance companies,
States? Does the system we have developedyou would think they would have a vested
here really allow us to take care of our health? Orinterest in keeping everyone healthy. Until
does it wait until we get sick and then try andrecently, preventive care was not even an
treat the ailment instead of the disease? Or, evenexpense the insurance industry was prepared to
worse, is it really only treating the symptoms ofpay for. On further reflection, however, a healthy
the disease and not deal with the actual cause?population might also not be in the interest of the
In our overly capitalist society, all we have to doinsurance industry. If we had less fear of getting
is take a look at where the money is to get ansick and had a complete solution working towards
accurate answer to this question. Wealth andthis goal, maybe people would give second
money means power in the United Statesthoughts about having an expensive insurance
including influence over the all-important politicalpolicy. Everyone would spend their insurance
decisions that mold our society. It is no surprisemoney on preventive medicine and only have
that the power and the money in healthcare restsinsurance for catastrophic incidents.
in two places - the drug companies and theWhich brings me to the real alternative to
insurance companies. How do these two lobbies"healthcare" in the United States. Let's call it
view the subject of taking care of our health?"wellnesscare". It is sure we need healthcare
As far as the drug companies are concerned, Ireform but trying to fix the current system that
think it is very clear they have no interest in atreats the symptoms not the cause is like
healthy and vibrant population. If we were allchopping someone's head off because they have
healthy, wouldn't they go out of business? This isa headache. The prudent thing to do would be to
the main reason the drug industry spends billionsfind what is causing the headache! If we had as
of dollars every year inventing drugs that treatmany wellness care centers as we do hospitals,
the symptoms and not the cause. As long aswe would probably need less hospitals. Wellness
they can keep you sick, they can continue toeducation at schools and colleges would prepare
prescribe drugs that treat the symptoms. Nofuture generations to avoid illnesses instead of
sickness, no drugs! In fact some people have atrying to fight them. Forcing fast food chains to
theory that they invent drugs that treat the onedisclose all the illnesses that might develop by
symptom just to create another symptom - justrelying on their foods for our nutrition would put
to sell you yet another drug! If you think that ispressure on them to improve their menus.
far fetched, then talk to friend of mine that isLet's start reform by thinking first how we can
taking fourteen prescription drugs, twelve ofstay healthy. Don't let the FDA dictate what the
which are treating symptoms caused by thenaturopathic preventive industry can and cannot
other two.say. Create a new government agency to
To make matters worse, the drug companies arepromote wellness and let them compete with the
regulated by a government agency (the FDA)FDA. Call it the FWA (Federal Wellness Agency).
that is there to "protect" the consumer. ThisAllow it to increase the funding into natural cures
"protection" includes keeping you sick so theirthat may prevent illnesses and/or cure them. I
industry, which pays their salaries, can continue toam a strong believer for every illness that ever
sell you drugs that don't make you healthy. Theemerges, somewhere on this planet there is a
preventive care industry, which is addressedcure. Some people claim to have found natural
below, is not part of the FDA's mandate andsolutions to major diseases; ones that do not
even if they developed a cure for any particularcreate more side effects than the disease itself.
disease they are prohibited by law from makingBut we cannot talk about them.
such claims without the approval of the FDA.A perfect example is an interview that Dr. Joe
Sounds very much like the perfect setup forMcCord, a four-time nominee for a Nobel Prize,
"revolving doors".gives to a journalist from ABC TV about a new,
Even in the FDA's own publications they talknatural, leading-edge product, which has been
about providing solutions for people that areintroduced and has shown some prevention and
already sick. Here is an excerpt from the FDAcuring qualities of many our major diseases
Strategic Plan published in 2007:through tests on animals. Towards the end of this
"For example, better methods for selectinginterview he states: "We make no claims about
patients and assessing their responses during acuring any diseases or preventing any diseases.
clinical trial can translate directly to betterWe hope when enough studies are done, perhaps
methods of diagnosing and monitoring patients insuch claims will be able to be made in the future".
the clinic, and better methods for targetingMany people have discovered the cancer-curing
treatments to the patients who are most likely toproperties of this product, including my wife, but
benefit. Such tools will help bring individualizedthe FDA prevents this being openly publicized
medicine into the physician's office, to help shapewithout Dr. McCord's disclaimer.
the medical practice of the future."Let's make these types of cures mainstream and
My understanding of the English language regardingan important cornerstone of a new wellness care
the word "healthcare" would interpret it as "takingpolicy, not keep them on the fringes of the
care of your health" or in other words make surehealthcare debate. Get a policy in place that
you are healthy and prevent you from gettingchallenges the drug companies and the insurance
sick. This would mean that "healthcare" would becompanies and puts them on the defensive. This
synonymous with "wellness care" and not "illnesswill be the only way to get healthcare away from
care". There is a preventive care or wellnessthe politicians and CEO's and into the hands of the
industry but it is small, fragmented and rogue. Inpeople.
fact some people have been thrown into jail