Selecting the Right Software

Our practice was able to find a provider who metwanted a database back end that would scale well
our individual needs.as we grew, and we wanted something with an
We've waited until now to discuss the actualopen interface that we could report on. By the
process of how we determined our electronicway, ACID-compliant means that the database
medical records (EMR) software provider. Thehas the desired features of atomicity,
plan, which started over two years ago, originallyconsistency, isolation and durability.
was to establish an infrastructure and foundation2. We wanted a system which would give us the
to make a successful transition over to whateverability to create, modify and design powerful
product we would eventually choose to use.graphically based EMR templates with normalized
Here we will outline the particular criterion whichdata (not text).
you should use to select an EMR vendor. We'll3. We wanted a product and company with a
even discuss the exact reasons for determiningstrong practice management product that
and selecting the appropriate vendor for our fiveintegrated with EMR. We did not want to install a
location, 140-person practice.system with duplicate data entry and where all
I'd like to stress the fact that other practices,patient information isn't accessible from both the
both large and small, may be currentlyEMR and EPM.
contemplating this same choice, but also probablyAfter reviewing the products of about a dozen or
have different needs. They should make theso EMR vendors that had some experience with
choice of vendor with these needs in mind - thisophthalmology, we narrowed these down to a
article presents the overall process, offeringshort list of about four. These vendors were then
examples of the things that should be consideredinvited to make a presentation to our EMR
when matching your practice to a vendor.committee. After analyzing their capabilities and
A medical practice, Ocala Eye, has used anchecking references from not only ophthalmology
application called 'Fiscal' for its electronic medicalpractices but also practices of other specialties,
practice (EMR) solution up until the late 1990's. Theour choice was NextGen Healthcare Information
practice later made the choice to concentrate onSystems from Quality Systems, Inc.
hospital-based systems, choosing to no longer4. We wanted a system that could be fully
service practice-based systems (beginning insupported on both thin and fat clients (remote
2000). The Fiscal version wasn't ready for thecontrol and direct control, respectively) to
year Y2K, and at that time there weren't plans toaccommodate the low bandwidth of our satellite
switch from paper records to EMR.offices.
Most physicians, and ophthalmologists in particular,Reasoning and Choices:
tend to become highly-interested in new kinds ofIn addition to a solid database and total support
toys and gadgets. Often we must resist theon both thin and fat clients, we discovered
temptation to bring a hot new product back toNextGen meet our need to customize EMR
the office after discovering it at the recenttemplates. In addition to an award-winning
Academy meeting. When we do remember theproduct, NextGen had a superior EMR interface.
true plan about new technology, we simply turnToday, NextGen doesn't even use an interface;
the relevant info over to the electronic medicalinstead both the EMR and EPM share a common
records committee, which is comprised of certaindatabase. So, instead of sending patients' data
administrators and specific members of the ITbetween the two different products, the
and business departments. One primary goal ofinformation is already native in the application
the committee is to set up the criteria forbecause of the database.
selecting an EMR system that is specifically suitedWith this application, the added bonus of having a
to our practice.fully HIPAA ANSI X12N-compliant EPM claims
Criteria Selection:engine is included. This facilitates a direct electronic
The committee first established some generaldata interchange (EDI) with complete
guidelines of their expectations from an EMRHIPAA-compliance. We were then able to drop
system vendor. The committee decided that theyour clearing-house, meanwhile saving $11K annually
would only consider vendors with at least awhile providing ourselves with the ability to save
medium-sized presence in the market, expectedtime on accounts receivable and eliminating the
to survive into the foreseeable future. Vendorsmiddle-man.
would also have an EMR system in use in someNextGen has been excellent to work with as a
other area of ophthalmology.company, even developing into a positive element
Next we agreed upon the primary criteria uponin the success of this large-scope project; they
which to form our final decision:are receptive to suggestion and have a user
1. We wanted a robust ACID- compliant relationalgroup that forms into practices throughout the
database for several key reasons: we wanted thecountry, meeting occasionally for helpful training
data to be protected and able to recover fullyand discussion.
from failure, not just restore from backup; we