Selecting an EMR Software Vendor for Your Practice

You may be surprised that we haven't told youability to create, modify and design powerful
which electronic medical records (EMR) softwaregraphically-based EMR templates with normalized
you should implement at your practice. At ourdata (not text).
practice, the plan was to first establish a3. We wanted a robust ACID-compliant relational
foundation and infrastructure in order to laterdatabase for several key reasons: a) we wanted
implement an EMR product of our choosing.the data to be protected and able to recover fully
Now we'll outline the considerations to make tofrom failure, not just restore from backup; b) we
select an EMR system vendor. These guidelineswanted a database back end that would scale well
are what we used to select a particular vendoras we grew; c) we wanted something with an
and arrive at the solution which fit the needs ofopen interface that we could report on. By the
our medical practice. I should stress that otherway, ACID-compliant means that the database
large and small practices currently contemplatinghas the desired features of atomicity,
EMR may have completely different needs, andconsistency, isolation and durability.
should make their own choices with these needs4. We wanted a product and company with a
in mind.strong practice management product that
Our practice used an electronic practiceintegrated with EMR. We did not want to install a
management application, Fiscal, until the late 1990s.system with duplicate data entry, or one in which
In 2000 we made a choice to go to apatient information isn't accessible from both the
hospital-based system, meanwhile ceasing toEMR and EPM.
service practice-based systems. The Fiscal versionAfter we reviewed the products of over a dozen
we were using wasn't ready for Y2K. At thatEMR vendors that fit the parameters, we
time there weren't plans to move to EMR fromtrimmed the list down to just four. We then
paper records, although we knew that Medicalinvited these vendors to make presentations to
Manager was developing their own EMR system.our committee. After we analyzed their abilities
Many doctors tend to be interested in new toysand checked their references, we went with
and gadgets. Ophthalmologists often must resistNextGen Healthcare Information Systems, from
the temptation to bring a flashy EMR productQuality Systems, Inc.
home after learning of it at the latest AcademyReasoning and Choices
meeting. When we remind ourselves of the actualNextGen not only had an award-winning product,
plan, we give this sort of information over to thebut a better EMR interface as well. We found that
electronic medical records committee. ThisNextGen met our need for EMR template
committee is comprised of both administratorscustomization, as well as a solid database and
and members of the technical, business, and ITtotal support for both fat and thin clients.
departments. The primary goal of the committeeToday, NextGen doesn't use an interface. Instead,
is to select the main criteria for the EMR systemboth the EPM and EMR share a common
with suitability to the practice in mind.database. Rather than send patient data between
Selection Criteriaproducts, it's native to the application because of
To begin, our committee established somethe database. As a bonus, the application claims
guidelines for what they needed from an EMRengine is HIPAA ANSI X12N-compliant. This
system vendor. The short list only mentionedfacilitates direct electronic data interchanges with
businesses with at least mid-level marketcomplete HIPAA compliance.
presence. The vendors for consideration also hadWe chose to drop our clearing house, which
some existing EMR program, as well assaved $11,000 each year. Meanwhile, we saved
experience working in the field of ophthalmology.time on our accounts receivable by removing the
The committee selected four main criteria onmiddle man. NextGen has been easy to work
which to base our ultimate decision:with, even growing into a positive element in the
1. We wanted a system that could be fullysuccess of the project. The company is receptive
supported on both thin and fat clients, toto suggestions and has a helpful user group which
accommodate the low bandwidth of our satellitepractices throughout the country, meeting
offices.occasionally for training and discussion.
2. We wanted a system which would give us the