| ext">A challenge awaits the physician who has | | | | Not all EMRs accommodate all specialties — |
| had enough of the frustrating inefficiencies, | | | | regardless of what the sales rep claims. For |
| financial penalties, and antiquated practices | | | | example, some leading vendors have |
| associated with maintaining a paper-based medical | | | | well-developed content for family practice; ob |
| office. So the decision is made to digitize the | | | | gyn; internal medicine; and ear, nose, and throat; |
| practice. Any initial enthusiasm quickly wanes once | | | | but may not fare as well in specialties such as |
| an initial search for electronic medical records | | | | oncology or chiropractic. By asking the vendor to |
| uncovers hundreds of products and vendors. It | | | | demonstrate the product’s performance in |
| doesn’t take long before the 300 or so | | | | a specific specialty, the number of potential |
| electronic medical records system screenshots | | | | candidates will decrease. |
| and feature/benefit grids begin to look remarkably | | | | * SCALABILITY FOR GROWTH. Just as not all |
| similar. The sheer number of vendors occupying | | | | electronic medical records systems accommodate |
| the EMR (electronic medical records) market is | | | | all specialties, most are geared toward a specific |
| unmanageable without a basic product | | | | practice size — with features and cost |
| assessment/elimination strategy. | | | | typically reflecting the product’s expansion |
| For physician practices with limited time and | | | | capacity. In general, if the practice expects to add |
| resources, the selection process can appear | | | | providers or additional locations over time, it is |
| overwhelming. Fortunately, physicians can begin to | | | | important to start with a product that is stable |
| narrow down potential systems by eliminating | | | | and feature-rich enough to handle the workflow |
| uncertified products, as well as those built upon | | | | of a larger practice - even if the product’s |
| dated technology architectures. | | | | features may not be fully leveraged early in the |
| 1. ELIMINATE PRODUCTS NOT CERTIFIED BY | | | | product’s lifecycle. |
| THE CCHIT® (CERTIFICATION COMMISSION | | | | Finally, it is time to ask questions about the |
| FOR HEALTHCARE INFORMATION | | | | vendor’s service and support — the |
| TECHNOLOGY). | | | | most ambiguous, but arguably most important |
| By confining research only to CCHIT-certified EHR | | | | aspect in the decision making process. After all, |
| (electronic health record) products, a substantial | | | | you can purchase an electronic medical records |
| number of systems are quickly eliminated. As of | | | | software system with every bell and whistle, but |
| this writing, 53 ambulatory EHR systems have | | | | if the implementation is disorganized; the training |
| successfully met the 2007 standards, while only | | | | inadequate; or the post-installation support lacking |
| 18 have met the more rigorous 2008 criteria. | | | | — productivity will drop; providers and staff |
| Using CCHIT certification as an initial benchmark is | | | | will be frustrated; cash flow may be interrupted, |
| prudent for a variety of reasons: The CCHIT is | | | | or worse. |
| the leading Healthcare I.T. certification organization, | | | | 3. TAKE STOCK OF IN-HOUSE I.T. |
| and is publicly endorsed by the American | | | | (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY) RESOURCES. |
| Academy of Family Physicians; the American | | | | Does the practice have a staff I.T. department or |
| Academy of Pediatrics; the American College of | | | | a trusted I.T. firm? If not, it’s important to |
| Cardiology; and the American Medical Association, | | | | ensure that the software vendor offers I.T. |
| among others. In addition, a CCHIT Certified | | | | services. Improperly installed hardware or |
| designation ensures that a product has met the | | | | inaccessible support personnel can have a |
| basic requirements for functionality; | | | | detrimental effect on the success of the training |
| interoperability; and security and privacy. | | | | and implementation. |
| A 2008 CCHIT certification warrants the | | | | Some smaller practices opt for a web-based |
| product’s utilization of standard formats | | | | medical software installation to decrease the cost |
| enabling the exchange information with other | | | | of hardware and eliminate the need to maintain |
| systems — known as interoperability. The | | | | servers and other equipment. Web-based |
| exchange of patient information on a regional or | | | | installations are known as SaaS (Software as a |
| national level is the underpinning of a more | | | | Service) and are delivered by an ASP (Application |
| efficient and less costly healthcare system. Future | | | | Service Provider). The ASP hosts the software in |
| tax incentives and Medicare reimbursements may | | | | a secured data center, and the end-user (the |
| be tied not only to utilization of digital medical | | | | practice) simply accesses the system using a web |
| records in general — but specifically | | | | browser. All that is required is a high-speed |
| benefiting practices with CCHIT-certified EHR | | | | internet connection and a workstation. Access to |
| systems. | | | | the data is dependent upon the internet |
| 2. ELIMINATE PRODUCTS THAT DO NOT | | | | connection, so mission-critical applications are not |
| OPERATE ON A SHARED DATABASE FOR | | | | appropriate in a SaaS environment under most |
| BILLING AND PATIENT CHARTING. | | | | circumstances. |
| As little as five years ago, interfaced | | | | The alternative to a web-based installation is Client |
| practice management/billing and patient charting | | | | Server, requiring an onsite server and regular |
| systems were the norm. Today, | | | | maintenance of the system by the vendor. Both |
| interfaced systems are technologically | | | | types of installations have advantages and |
| inferior to medical software that has been | | | | disadvantages, so it is important to discuss |
| developed from the ground up by a single vendor, | | | | installation with potential vendors. |
| on a single platform, and utilizing a single database | | | | 4. ASSESS TECHNOLOGICAL SKILLS OF |
| — described as integrated’ or | | | | CLINICIANS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF. |
| unified’ electronic medical records and | | | | ENSURE THE VENDOR’S PROJECT |
| medical practice management systems. | | | | PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION STAFF CAN |
| Interfaced systems are still sold today, so it is a | | | | AID THE PRACTICE IN CHOOSING WHO THE |
| buyers beware market. In the past several | | | | FUNCTIONAL AREA CHAMPIONS WILL BE. |
| years, there have been a number of mergers and | | | | Medical software training and go-live |
| acquisitions between vendors having market | | | | support expenditures account for a substantial |
| share in one side or the other (scheduling and | | | | portion of the total initial system cost, and careful |
| billing or charting/EMR) but desired a | | | | planning is essential for a smooth implementation. |
| comprehensive solution to offer physicians. As a | | | | The vendor should provide a project coordinator |
| result, there are products currently marketed as | | | | that will help the practice make critical decisions |
| a suite, but were developed by disparate | | | | and schedule the project timeline. Most practices |
| vendors on different platforms, tied together | | | | utilize a combination of web-based and on-site |
| using a separate application. Although generally | | | | training prior to go-live (the days or weeks |
| transparent to the practice, there may be | | | | dedicated to using the new system). In addition, |
| questions of data integrity; patient safety (for | | | | the vendor should provide onsite support for the |
| example, a patient’s practice management | | | | practice during the go-live. The number of training |
| billing record does not match the clinical record and | | | | days, go-live days, and the delivery (web-based |
| lab results get overlooked in the mess); and even | | | | or onsite) is determined by the size of the |
| the vendor’s long-term maintenance of the | | | | practice and the skill levels of the staff. Follow-up |
| system. | | | | sessions to reinforce original training or introduce |
| Unfortunately, uncovering if a system is | | | | advanced concepts is important for continuity. |
| integrated or interfaced is not always | | | | To keep costs down, some practices may utilize |
| straightforward and may require the buyer to | | | | a heavier web-based training plan for the bulk of |
| conduct some detective work. The first step is to | | | | the staff with designated superusers who attend |
| ask the vendor questions about the | | | | advanced training. For practices with less |
| product’s history — which company | | | | technologically savvy staff, more handholding |
| developed it, does it utilize a common database, | | | | through onsite training may be the best option. In |
| and is there a single login for billing and charting? | | | | addition to improperly installed I.T. (hardware, |
| Some interfaced systems require users to log in | | | | networking, security, workstations), insufficient |
| separately to access the practice management | | | | training or post-implementation technical support |
| billing and the clinical portions of the software. | | | | are prominent failure points in medical software |
| Following the elimination of uncertified products | | | | implementations. |
| with dated technology, the pool of suitable | | | | 5. WHO SUPPORTS THE PRACTICE FOLLOWING |
| products begins to shrink and the specific needs | | | | THE GO-LIVE? THE ORIGINAL TRAINING AND |
| of the practice should be defined and considered. | | | | IMPLEMENTATION STAFF, OR AN OUTSOURCED |
| * ESTABLISH A BUDGET. Medical software | | | | CALL CENTER? |
| systems vary widely in cost. By establishing a | | | | Not only does unresponsive technical support |
| flexible budget early in the process, practices can | | | | frustrate and discourage users, it fosters lost |
| avoid wasted time looking at systems that are | | | | productivity when users struggle with denied |
| too expensive or potentially not robust enough to | | | | claims; unanswered questions; or broken |
| meet the needs of the practice. Ask questions | | | | functionality. Still, large vendors often outsource |
| about ongoing maintenance costs and what the | | | | support to overseas call centers — |
| maintenance covers, just as a buyer would ask | | | | lowering vendor overhead at the expense of |
| when making decision to purchase a car. | | | | high-quality, timely, and knowledgeable support. |
| * EVALUATE SPECIALTY-SPECIFIC CONTENT. | | | | |