Physician

ext">A challenge awaits the physician who hasNot all EMRs accommodate all specialties —
had enough of the frustrating inefficiencies,regardless of what the sales rep claims. For
financial penalties, and antiquated practicesexample, some leading vendors have
associated with maintaining a paper-based medicalwell-developed content for family practice; ob
office. So the decision is made to digitize thegyn; internal medicine; and ear, nose, and throat;
practice. Any initial enthusiasm quickly wanes oncebut may not fare as well in specialties such as
an initial search for electronic medical recordsoncology or chiropractic. By asking the vendor to
uncovers hundreds of products and vendors. Itdemonstrate the product’s performance in
doesn’t take long before the 300 or soa specific specialty, the number of potential
electronic medical records system screenshotscandidates will decrease.
and feature/benefit grids begin to look remarkably* SCALABILITY FOR GROWTH. Just as not all
similar. The sheer number of vendors occupyingelectronic medical records systems accommodate
the EMR (electronic medical records) market isall specialties, most are geared toward a specific
unmanageable without a basic productpractice size — with features and cost
assessment/elimination strategy.typically reflecting the product’s expansion
For physician practices with limited time andcapacity. In general, if the practice expects to add
resources, the selection process can appearproviders or additional locations over time, it is
overwhelming. Fortunately, physicians can begin toimportant to start with a product that is stable
narrow down potential systems by eliminatingand feature-rich enough to handle the workflow
uncertified products, as well as those built uponof a larger practice - even if the product’s
dated technology architectures.features may not be fully leveraged early in the
1. ELIMINATE PRODUCTS NOT CERTIFIED BYproduct’s lifecycle.
THE CCHIT® (CERTIFICATION COMMISSIONFinally, it is time to ask questions about the
FOR HEALTHCARE INFORMATIONvendor’s service and support — the
TECHNOLOGY).most ambiguous, but arguably most important
By confining research only to CCHIT-certified EHRaspect in the decision making process. After all,
(electronic health record) products, a substantialyou can purchase an electronic medical records
number of systems are quickly eliminated. As ofsoftware system with every bell and whistle, but
this writing, 53 ambulatory EHR systems haveif the implementation is disorganized; the training
successfully met the 2007 standards, while onlyinadequate; or the post-installation support lacking
18 have met the more rigorous 2008 criteria.— productivity will drop; providers and staff
Using CCHIT certification as an initial benchmark iswill be frustrated; cash flow may be interrupted,
prudent for a variety of reasons: The CCHIT isor worse.
the leading Healthcare I.T. certification organization,3. TAKE STOCK OF IN-HOUSE I.T.
and is publicly endorsed by the American(INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY) RESOURCES.
Academy of Family Physicians; the AmericanDoes the practice have a staff I.T. department or
Academy of Pediatrics; the American College ofa trusted I.T. firm? If not, it’s important to
Cardiology; and the American Medical Association,ensure that the software vendor offers I.T.
among others. In addition, a CCHIT Certifiedservices. Improperly installed hardware or
designation ensures that a product has met theinaccessible support personnel can have a
basic requirements for functionality;detrimental effect on the success of the training
interoperability; and security and privacy.and implementation.
A 2008 CCHIT certification warrants theSome smaller practices opt for a web-based
product’s utilization of standard formatsmedical software installation to decrease the cost
enabling the exchange information with otherof hardware and eliminate the need to maintain
systems — known as interoperability. Theservers and other equipment. Web-based
exchange of patient information on a regional orinstallations are known as SaaS (Software as a
national level is the underpinning of a moreService) and are delivered by an ASP (Application
efficient and less costly healthcare system. FutureService Provider). The ASP hosts the software in
tax incentives and Medicare reimbursements maya secured data center, and the end-user (the
be tied not only to utilization of digital medicalpractice) simply accesses the system using a web
records in general — but specificallybrowser. All that is required is a high-speed
benefiting practices with CCHIT-certified EHRinternet connection and a workstation. Access to
systems.the data is dependent upon the internet
2. ELIMINATE PRODUCTS THAT DO NOTconnection, so mission-critical applications are not
OPERATE ON A SHARED DATABASE FORappropriate in a SaaS environment under most
BILLING AND PATIENT CHARTING.circumstances.
As little as five years ago, “interfaced”The alternative to a web-based installation is Client
practice management/billing and patient chartingServer, requiring an onsite server and regular
systems were the norm. Today,maintenance of the system by the vendor. Both
“interfaced” systems are technologicallytypes of installations have advantages and
inferior to medical software that has beendisadvantages, so it is important to discuss
developed from the ground up by a single vendor,installation with potential vendors.
on a single platform, and utilizing a single database4. ASSESS TECHNOLOGICAL SKILLS OF
— described as ‘integrated’ orCLINICIANS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF.
‘unified’ electronic medical records andENSURE THE VENDOR’S PROJECT
medical practice management systems.PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION STAFF CAN
Interfaced systems are still sold today, so it is aAID THE PRACTICE IN CHOOSING WHO THE
“buyers beware” market. In the past severalFUNCTIONAL AREA “CHAMPIONS” WILL BE.
years, there have been a number of mergers andMedical software training and “go-live”
acquisitions between vendors having marketsupport expenditures account for a substantial
share in one side or the other (scheduling andportion of the total initial system cost, and careful
billing or charting/EMR) but desired aplanning is essential for a smooth implementation.
comprehensive solution to offer physicians. As aThe vendor should provide a project coordinator
result, there are products currently marketed asthat will help the practice make critical decisions
a “suite,” but were developed by disparateand schedule the project timeline. Most practices
vendors on different platforms, tied togetherutilize a combination of web-based and on-site
using a separate application. Although generallytraining prior to go-live (the days or weeks
transparent to the practice, there may bededicated to using the new system). In addition,
questions of data integrity; patient safety (forthe vendor should provide onsite support for the
example, a patient’s practice managementpractice during the go-live. The number of training
billing record does not match the clinical record anddays, go-live days, and the delivery (web-based
lab results get overlooked in the mess); and evenor onsite) is determined by the size of the
the vendor’s long-term maintenance of thepractice and the skill levels of the staff. Follow-up
system.sessions to reinforce original training or introduce
Unfortunately, uncovering if a system isadvanced concepts is important for continuity.
integrated or interfaced is not alwaysTo keep costs down, some practices may utilize
straightforward and may require the buyer toa heavier web-based training plan for the bulk of
conduct some detective work. The first step is tothe staff with designated superusers who attend
ask the vendor questions about theadvanced training. For practices with less
product’s history — which companytechnologically savvy staff, more handholding
developed it, does it utilize a common database,through onsite training may be the best option. In
and is there a single login for billing and charting?addition to improperly installed I.T. (hardware,
Some interfaced systems require users to log innetworking, security, workstations), insufficient
separately to access the practice managementtraining or post-implementation technical support
billing and the clinical portions of the software.are prominent failure points in medical software
Following the elimination of uncertified productsimplementations.
with dated technology, the pool of suitable5. WHO SUPPORTS THE PRACTICE FOLLOWING
products begins to shrink and the specific needsTHE GO-LIVE? THE ORIGINAL TRAINING AND
of the practice should be defined and considered.IMPLEMENTATION STAFF, OR AN OUTSOURCED
* ESTABLISH A BUDGET. Medical softwareCALL CENTER?
systems vary widely in cost. By establishing aNot only does unresponsive technical support
flexible budget early in the process, practices canfrustrate and discourage users, it fosters lost
avoid wasted time looking at systems that areproductivity when users struggle with denied
too expensive or potentially not robust enough toclaims; unanswered questions; or broken
meet the needs of the practice. Ask questionsfunctionality. Still, large vendors often outsource
about ongoing maintenance costs and what thesupport to overseas call centers —
maintenance covers, just as a buyer would asklowering vendor overhead at the expense of
when making decision to purchase a car.high-quality, timely, and knowledgeable support.
* EVALUATE SPECIALTY-SPECIFIC CONTENT.