Executive Succession Planning - Taking It to the Board Room

Executive succession planning should be anKhurana, Laura Reeves argue that corporate
ongoing Board function. Best practicesboards have traditionally underestimated the role
organizations are moving executive successionof a robust leadership development and executive
planning and leadership development from thesuccession planning system in risk management.
human resources department into C-level suitesThey suggest that the steady attrition in talent
and the Board Room in their pursuit of elevatedthat occurs in the absence of an effective
business continuity planning. This is because theexecutive succession planning system leaves
business and financial risks of executive mis-hirescompanies vulnerable to making poor decisions in
and misalignment can be as threatening to theany number of commonplace business scenarios
viability of an organization as an operations failuresuch as an acquisition or sharpened competition.
or a major data security breach. Given theIn lieu of the stand-alone, ad-hoc activities used
challenges faced by hospitals today on manyby human resources departments, these experts
fronts - and because only 30% of hospitalrecommend Board-level direction of smart,
executives routinely consider succession planningintegrated, talent development and executive
and take stock of who's on the leadership bench1succession planning initiatives that are aligned with
- senior management should considerstrategic priorities. Their ideal organization is one in
institutionalizing a Board-level function to overseewhich HR provides development tools and
leadership development and executive successionfacilitates their use, senior executives are deeply
planning and implementation.involved in sourcing and growing talent and
Quantifying the Costsbusiness leaders are evaluated on their
Using a formula put forth by Bradford D. Smart,contributions to the organization-wide talent
Ph.D., in his book, Topgrading: How Leadingdevelopment and executive succession planning
Companies Win by Hiring, Coaching and Keepingeffort.
the Best People, I have calculated that the costHospitals' Particular Vulnerability
of a bad hiring decision ranges from $2.4 millionAccording to the 2007 survey by the Association
for a $100,000-per-year employee to a staggeringfor Healthcare Executives, 32% of hospital CEOs
$12 million for a $500,000-per-year executive.say that their hospitals' approach to CEO
Based on my 13 years of executive searchsuccession planning was effective or very
experience and completion of more than 225effective - which means that a whopping 68% of
assignments, I believe these numbers are close tohospital CEOs acknowledge some concern about
the mark. For discussion sake, let's agree that theprocesses for identifying and selecting the person
numbers are inflated and we will take thewho will fill their shoes. Moreover - and no surprise
numbers down to a mere 25% of the researchedhere - only 16% of hospital CEOs said their
amount, which means that you're still looking at ahospitals' approach to communicating about
$3 million cost for a bad hiring decision involving aexecutive succession planning to hospital staff
$500,000-per-year executive! Executive mis-hireswas effective or very effective.
and poor executive succession planning will costIn recent years hospitals have been taking pages
you.from the corporate marketing handbook. Now it
Million dollar mistakes are costly to your business,may be time for them to take a closer look at
shareholders and possibly your personal career.effective corporate approaches to leadership
The lack of executive succession planningdevelopment and executive succession planning.
methodologies allows for mis-hired and misalignedCohn, Khurana and Reeves point to Tyson Foods,
executives to incur costs for their companyStarbucks and Mellon Financial (now The Bank of
related to sub-standard customer service,New York Mellon) as forward-thinking companies
inadequate research, missed deadlines and saleswith smart, integrated, talent development and
targets, failed marketing campaigns, flawedexecutive succession planning initiatives.
accounting or investment strategies and so muchInside Information
more. Additionally, there are the up-front costs ofWhether or not executive succession planning
recruitment and training, the severance you maygets promoted to the Board Room, senior
have to pay to get an employee to leave and thehospital management would do well to review the
costs of recruitment, training and ramp-up timework of Harvard Business School professor
for the replacement employee. The absence ofJoseph Bower, who has studied 1,800 successions
executive succession planning spotlights that pooracross all industries. Bower looked at the results
hiring decisions and the lack of a strong bench canof companies that promote insiders through
be a significant drain to a department's andexecutive succession planning to senior leadership
company's income. With business continuity andpositions and found that they perform significantly
shareholder value in mind, Board-level oversight ofbetter when measured over more than three
recruiting, leadership development and executiveyears than companies that do not look inside first.
succession planning will result in better overallBy many measures, the stakes for hospitals are
human resource allocation and improvedhigh. Hospitals who cast leadership development
competitive positioning.and executive succession planning will be better
From Costs to Business Riskspositioned for risk management success,
In their article published in the Harvard Businessincreased profitability and shareholder value and
Review, "Growing Talent as If Your Businessoperational continuity in the 21st century
Depended on It," Jeffrey M. Cohn, Rakeshhealthcare environment.