Electronic Medical Records - A Look at the Past With a View Into the Future

Computer-based systems utilized to record,most American would have an EMR within ten
deliver and manage patients' personal medical datayears. But despite the involvement of numerous
are known as Electronic Medical Records (EMR).federal agencies, electronic systems have been
Any information taken at doctor visits, includingadopted by only a small number of physicians and
medical history, physicals, lab tests, prescriptions,hospitals. The New England Journal of Medicine
referrals and procedures performed in the office,reported that, in a 2008 study of 2,758 primary
hospital or clinic can be transferred tocare physicians, only 4% reported having an
computer-based patient records (CPR). This dataextensive, fully functional electronic records
can also include biopsies, imaging, specimen testssystem, and 13% reported having a basic system.
and diagnostic testing procedures.According to a 2004 study by Miller and Sim,
Methods of medical documentation have evolvedprivate practices have been slow to adopt EMR
over the past 50 years, with the concept ofbecause of early start-up costs and uncertain
electronic medical record (EMR) first introduced infinancial gains. They noted that upfront costs for
1969. Through the early 1960s, most doctorsEMRs ranged from $16,000 to $36,000 per
used handwritten notes in charts to record patientphysician. In the initial weeks of using a new
care. With the development of the mini cassettesystem, many practices also see fewer patients
in 1967 and the micro cassette in 1969, physiciansand spend more time entering data into their
and hospitals began adopting dictation/transcriptionEMRs, which leads to longer work days.
which permitted more legible and thoroughArea hospitals or testing centers experience data
documentation of medical histories andexchange issue with EMRs and laboratory or
examination findings. With the advent of digitalradiology systems. The necessary computer
computer technology we entered the age of theprograms for such exchanges are either
EMR and EHR (electronic health record).unavailable, or costly to maintain and upgrade.
Another important step in medical recordsDespite these barriers there are numerous
management was the development of the Healthadvantages to adoption of EMR in private practice.
Evaluation through Logical Processing (HELP)Predictions based on statistical models suggest
system in the late 1960s. This integrated hospitalthat Health Information Technology has the
information system provided decision support forpotential to assist in dramatically transforming the
health professionals and demonstrated thatdelivery of health care, making it safer and more
computer systems could not only replace papereffective.
records, but also improve the process of care byMy personal experience with EMR has been
enhancing the use of records.altogether positive. In 1996, after fifteen years of
In 1991, the Institute of Medicine published Theprivate practice in podiatry, I transitioned from a
Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essentialdictation/transcription system to MD Logic, Inc., an
Technology for Health Care. This seminalelectronic medical documentation system. Within
document presented blueprints for the future ofthe first year I realized a profit on my investment
computer-based patient records (CPR). In theresulting from more accurate coding and
1997 revised version, an expert committeeincreased efficiency in office work flow, as well as
explored the potential of CPRs to improveincreased referrals related to improved
decisions about diagnosis and care, providedcommunications with referring physicians. The
database for policy making, and attempted tomost significant effect, however, was an increase
answer these questions:in quality of care to my patients. As the podiatric
- Who uses patient records? - What technology isknowledge base evolved, I was able to spend
available and what further research is necessarymore time in face-to-face interaction with my
to meet users' needs? - What shouldpatients, and less time documenting.
government, medical organizations, and others doIn 2006, I transitioned my group practice into MD
to make the transition to CPRs?Logic Worldwide EMR, a fully functional EMR. This
In 2003, the Quality of Health Care in Americaenabled our office to go paperless. All components
Committee of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) filedof the patient's medical record are stored on a
a report titled Patient Safety: Achieving a Newhard drive and accessible from any computer at
Standard of Care. In it, the IOM encouragedall of our offices. The streamlining of work flow
hospitals and physicians to adopt EMRs as a majorand elimination of redundant tasks resulted in
step toward preventing medical errors.major improvement in the efficiency and attitudes
Also in 2003, the RAND Health Informationof employees. Instant access to patient's medical
Technology Project began a study of EMRs withrecords and insurance information has proven to
two objectives:be an invaluable resource. In addition, the creation
1. To better understand the role and importanceof an interface permits transfer of information
of EMRs in improving health carefrom the medical record to the practice
2. To encourage government actions that couldmanagement billing software.
maximize the benefits of EMRs and increase theirAt this time, the future direction of EMR appears
useto be in the hands of the government. The
The RAND study estimated the potential savings,American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
costs, and health and safety benefits of EMRs if2009 provides significant cash incentives to
adopted widely and used effectively. Some of thephysicians who implement electronic health
key findings of the study included:records. However, in order to qualify for these
- Health Information Technology would saveincentives the physician must not only have the
money and significantly improve healthcare quality.proper software but must engage in "meaningful
- The annual savings from efficiency alone coulduse" of the software. The government plans to
exceed $77 billion. - Health and safety benefitspublish the criteria for meaningful use in February
could double the savings while reducing illness and2010. ARRA incentive reimbursement to
prolonging life. - Obstacles to adoption of EMRsphysicians will begin in 2011.
include market disincentives because in general,Early adopters of EMR have been able to reap
those who pay for Health Information Technologythe numerous benefits of this innovative
do not receive the related savings.technology while preparing for 21st century health
In response to these findings, the federalcare delivery. Physicians now have a tool which
government moved to improve health carecan dramatically improve their medical outcomes
quality and efficiency, and established the goal thatand the quality of their patient's lives.